Option A

Cardio (Aerobic Exercise)

The long-established pillar of cardiovascular fitness.

Best for: Men looking to improve heart and lung efficiency, lower blood pressure, and manage body weight through sustained aerobic activity.

Option B

Strength Training (Resistance Exercise)

The muscle-building approach with underrated heart benefits.

Best for: Men aiming to build lean mass, improve metabolic health, and reduce cardiovascular risk factors alongside — or between — aerobic sessions.

How Each Type of Exercise Affects the Heart

Aerobic exercise — running, cycling, swimming, brisk walking — challenges the heart to pump blood more efficiently over sustained periods. Over time, this leads to measurable adaptations: a lower resting heart rate, greater stroke volume (the amount of blood the heart pumps per beat), and improved elasticity in blood vessel walls. These changes collectively reduce the strain placed on the heart during everyday activity.

Strength training works through a different mechanism. Lifting weights creates temporary spikes in blood pressure and heart rate during sets, but the long-term cardiovascular adaptations are still meaningful. Regular resistance exercise reduces resting blood pressure, lowers LDL cholesterol in some populations, and — critically — reduces visceral fat, the deep abdominal fat most strongly associated with cardiovascular risk in men. It also improves insulin sensitivity, which is closely tied to heart disease risk.

For a broader look at how these two approaches compare across general health outcomes, see Strength Training vs. Cardio: What Actually Matters for Long-Term Health.

CriterionCardioStrength Training
Primary heart benefit Improves cardiac output and efficiency Reduces visceral fat and insulin resistance
Blood pressure impact Well-documented reduction at rest Moderate reduction with consistent training
Resting heart rate Lowers significantly over time Modest effect
Cholesterol profile Raises HDL, lowers triglycerides May lower LDL in some populations
Metabolic health Burns calories; supports weight management Builds muscle; raises resting metabolic rate
Cardiovascular mortality risk Strongest predictor in long-term research Independent risk reduction, additive to cardio
Equipment required Minimal (walking, running) Weights, bands, or machines helpful

What the Research Generally Indicates

Decades of research have established aerobic fitness as one of the strongest predictors of cardiovascular mortality. Studies consistently show that men with higher cardiorespiratory fitness — regardless of body weight — face substantially lower risks of dying from heart disease. The relationship appears dose-dependent: more aerobic capacity generally correlates with better outcomes, though benefits plateau at very high levels.

Evidence for resistance training's heart benefits has grown considerably in recent years. A 2019 analysis published in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise found that resistance exercise was independently associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular events, even after controlling for aerobic activity levels. This suggests the two exercise types are not interchangeable — they each contribute something distinct.

150 min

Weekly moderate aerobic activity recommended

The American Heart Association recommends at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic exercise per week for cardiovascular health.

2x/week

Minimum strength training frequency advised

U.S. physical activity guidelines call for muscle-strengthening activity on at least two days per week in addition to aerobic exercise.

~17%

Reduced cardiovascular event risk from resistance training

A 2019 meta-analysis in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise estimated roughly a 17% lower risk of cardiovascular events associated with regular resistance exercise.

Men who are curious about lower-intensity aerobic approaches may find it useful to read about Zone 2 cardio, a method emphasizing sustained, moderate effort that has drawn attention for its cardiovascular and metabolic benefits.

What Current Guidelines Recommend

The American Heart Association and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services both recommend that adults aim for at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic activity — or 75 minutes of vigorous activity — per week, combined with muscle-strengthening activities on two or more days per week. These aren't competing recommendations; they're designed to work together.

Research supports this combined approach. Men who perform both aerobic and resistance exercise tend to show better blood pressure, lipid profiles, and body composition outcomes than those who rely on only one type. The combination also appears to support longer-term adherence, partly because variety reduces monotony.

Men With Heart Conditions: Consult First

If you have been diagnosed with coronary artery disease, heart failure, arrhythmia, or another cardiovascular condition, both aerobic and resistance exercise can still be beneficial — but the intensity, type, and progression need to be tailored by a healthcare professional or cardiac rehabilitation specialist. Do not use general population guidelines as a substitute for personalized medical guidance.

Exercise is just one component of heart health. Diet plays an equally important role — for more on how nutritional needs evolve for men specifically, see Nutrition Priorities That Shift as Men Get Older.

For men weighing how to structure their workouts socially or independently, Group Fitness Classes vs. Solo Training may help clarify which environment supports better consistency.

This article is for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before starting, changing, or intensifying any exercise program, particularly if you have a known or suspected heart condition.

Share

Health Editorial Team · Contributor

Health Editorial Team is the collective byline for our editorial team and contributor network. Articles published under this byline or an editorial pen name are researched, written, and reviewed according to our editorial standards for clarity, consistency, and independence before publication.

The content on this site is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional advice. Always consult a qualified professional for guidance specific to your situation.